The success of the design strategy lies in the development of software operated both by the scientists in Eugene and the designers in Graz. At times, this allowed patterns to be developed on a 24-hour schedule – when designs were completed at the end of the Austrian day, the patterns were sent over at the start of the Oregon day. It is also worth emphasizing the expertise of the three teams – the “design police,” the “fractal police,” and the “manufacturing police” ensured that there were no weak links as the designs progressed towards their completion. As with all great inter-disciplinary endeavors, creativity was an emergent phenomenon beyond the capabilities of the individual teams. The design of the collection centered on the fact that natural scenes display ‘fractal composites’ whereby individual fractal objects (branches, water, clouds, etc.) visually merge to form the overall fractal pattern (Figure 4 - branches example). In addition to more closely capturing the essence of nature, fractal composites provided more flexibility to develop patterns that are appealing from a design perspective. To visualize the compositional principle underlying these fractals, the team explored the analogy of individual fractal trees combining to generate a fractal forest. Fractal trajectories called Lévy flights were used as the basis of the designs and these flights featured a fractal mix of trajectories with many different flight lengths (Figure 6). Much like a bird dropping a seed whenever it lands, the seeds then grew into fractal trees at the locations between the flight trajectories. A second motivation for the ‘bird flight’ composition strategy is that we know eye movements (Figure 5) follow fractal trajectories when viewing fractal patterns. These designs therefore placed the tree locations using the same fractal statistics that the eye adopts when viewing them.